私とAIの移住計画✨

現場から生まれた「社腸」という組織論で、会社の詰まりを言語化する

Why “Good Practices” Fail Without Structural Integration

Abstract visual representing organizational pathology and structural diagnosis

Diagnosis

Many organizations proudly adopt “best practices.”

New frameworks.
New tools.
New rules.

They look modern.
They sound rational.

And yet—nothing changes.

The practice exists.
The results do not.


Practices Are Not the System

A practice that functions only when specific individuals are present
is not part of the system.

It is decoration.

When a practice is truly integrated, it survives turnover.
When it is merely added, it collapses with the people who carried it.

This distinction is often misunderstood.

Organizations confuse presence with integration.


Common Structural Error

The typical response to failure is familiar:

  • “We need better discipline.”
  • “People aren’t following the rules.”
  • “The culture hasn’t caught up yet.”

These explanations focus on behavior.

But behavior does not exist independently.
It is shaped—rewarded or punished—by structure.

If the structure does not support the practice,
compliance becomes optional.

And optional systems never last.


Integration Is Not Training

Training teaches what to do.
Integration determines what actually happens.

A structurally integrated practice changes:

  • Decision pathways
  • Incentives
  • Visibility of problems
  • Cost of non-compliance

If these remain unchanged,
the practice remains cosmetic.


Diagnosis

When a “good practice” disappears after:

  • Leadership changes
  • Key personnel leave
  • Attention shifts elsewhere

The problem was never execution.

It was structural non-integration.

Until the structure changes,
even the best practices will fail to take root.

Related:

コメント

コメントを残す

メールアドレスが公開されることはありません。 が付いている欄は必須項目です

CAPTCHA